Introduction to Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture In the realm of criminal law, the concept of “Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture” plays a pivotal role in ensuring that crime does not pay. This legal provision allows courts to impose a monetary fine on offenders when the property involved, deemed as […]
Author: Nicholas Robinson Criminal Lawyer
Understanding Marital Privilege in Criminal Law
Introduction to Marital Privilege Marital privilege, a legal protection rooted deeply in the principles of marital harmony, plays a crucial role in the judicial landscape of Canada. This principle is designed to prevent a spouse from being compelled to testify against their partner, thereby preserving the sanctity and confidentiality inherent […]
Understanding Your Right to Additional Opportunities to Consult with Counsel
Understanding your rights as a detainee is crucial for ensuring fair treatment and protecting your interests. By familiarizing yourself with the general principles, exceptions, and procedures surrounding the right to counsel, you can navigate detainee situations more confidently and effectively. Section 10(b) – Right to Counsel Section 10(b) of the […]
What to Expect When You’re Facing Criminal Charges in Canada
Navigating the criminal justice system can be daunting, especially if you’re unfamiliar with the criminal process and the implications of being charged. This guide breaks down some of the essentials you need to know to understand the legal landscape and make informed decisions. Types of Criminal Offences Choosing the Court […]
Introduction to Confessions in Criminal Law
Confessions play a crucial role in criminal proceedings, influenced by long standing legal principles. Their admissibility hinges on whether they are voluntary and free from coercion. Historical Context Ibrahim v. R. [1914]: Established the foundational rule that confessions must be voluntary to be admissible, emphasizing protection against coercion by authority […]
R. v. M.Y.
The accused was charged with Assault CC. 266 on their spouse. The accused began receiving counselling. Upon the completion of treatment to the satisfaction of the Crown, a Stay of Proceedings was issued with the accused maintaining no criminal record.
R. v. J.H.
The accused was charged with Mischief Under $5K CC. 430(4). The matter was referred to alternative measures program. Upon the accused’s completion of alternative measures, the charges were withdrawn. Resulting in no criminal record.
R. v. I.M.
Our client was charged with Prowling at Night CC.177, and Mischief Under $5K CC. 430(4). The matter was referred to alternative measures programing. Upon the accused’s completion of alternative measures, the charges were withdrawn, resulting in no criminal record.
R. v. D.A.
The accused was charged with Obstructing a Peace Officer CC.129(a), Dangerous Driving CC320.13(1), and Operate Without Due Care and Attention TSA. 213(1). The matter received a Stay of Proceedings.