The accused was charged with Assault cc.266 regarding their intimate partner. Following early discussions with the Crown, the Crown issued Stay of Proceedings. The accused maintains a clean criminal record.
Recent Cases
R. v. J. O.
The accused was charged with driving under the influence cc.320.14(2), and failure to stop following an accident involving bodily harm cc.320.16(2). After proceeding to trial, the Crown issued a Stay of Proceedings on all charges.
R. v. T.W.
The accused was charged with Assault cc.266 in a domestic dispute with their partner. After the accused attended counselling, the Crown issued a Stay of Proceedings on the matter. The accused maintains a clean criminal record.
R. v. C. R.
The accused was charged with failure or refusal to provide a breath sample following an accident. After discussions with Crown and Experts, Crown issues Stay of Proceedings.
R. v. C. H.
The accused was charged with sexual assault against their partner. Following Pre-Trial discussions, Crown issues Stay of Proceedings.
R. v. T. J.
The accused was charged with disobeying a signal to stop for a peace officer and was later charged with two separate counts of failure to attend court. After negotiations with Crown, Crown issued Stay of Proceedings issued on all fail to appear charges and Client plead guilty for disobeying signal […]
R. v. D. N.
The accused was charged with crossing a solid line to change lanes. Matter was taken to trial and the accused was acquitted.
R. v. S. K.
The accused was charged with impaired driving and exceeding 0.8. The police officer took too long to produce ASD. As a result, after the charter application, the test results were excluded. Consequently, the accused received a full acquittal on all charges.
R. v. T. L.
The accused was charged with impaired operation cc.320.14(1)(a) and exceeding .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). Stay of proceeding issued on exceeding .08 charge. Guilty plea to impaired operation. Sentence consists of 1-year driving prohibition and $1,000 fine.