The accused, who was a youth, was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a), Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). The accused received a conditional discharge with conditions after pleading guilty to Impaired Driving.
Tag: Impaired Driving
R.v. G.E.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a). Matter was stayed by the Crown after delay in getting blood analysis results.
R.v. W.C.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a), Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b), and Dangerous Operation CC.320.13 The matter was later set for trial. Just prior to trial starting, guilty plea entered to impaired with 1-Year driving prohibition, and $1,500 fine.
R. v. G.E.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a) as they were believed to have been impaired by cannabis while driving. After the Crown’s delay in providing blood results, the charge was stayed.
R.v. A.B.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a) and Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). The matter was later set for trial. All charges were stayed in the lead up to trial.
R. v. J.L.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a) and Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). Upon completion of trial, they were acquitted of all charges after the court agreed that their Charter Rights were violated in their arrest
R. v. F.H.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a) and Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). The matter was referred to alternative measures. Upon the accused’s completion of local alternative measures programing, the charges were withdrawn. Resulting in no criminal record.
R. v. J.B.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a) and Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). After setting the matter for trial, the matter received a Stay of Proceedings before trial began.
R. v. B.B.
The accused was charged with Impaired Driving CC.320.14(1)(a) and Exceed .08 cc.320.14(1)(b). The matter was scheduled for trial and later received a Stay of Proceedings prior to trial date.